Prescriptive budgeting methods can be harmful

The annual budget round is important: a time to assess the previous year's performance and put in place essential building blocks for the coming year. At least, in an ideal world it should be treated as such. The growing influence of accounts departments, their overdependence on and slavish application of spreadsheets, and their centralisation of information, is making such an ideal impossible to achieve. To many who learned management in the spreadsheet age this might seem like a heresy, but it is not an argument for abandoning these important tools. It is an argument to change the way in which the power of information is utilised. It is a plea to move away from the prescriptive and proscribing approach towards one that empowers line managers to truly manage costs and resources - with Accounts in a supporting role. The Facilities Cross.

The Facilities Manager is a big spender with neither the clout of a revenue department nor the "mystique" of a technical department. Moreover, his or her activities are conditioned by clients. Postage, stationery, and photocopying costs can often be charged to a Facilities Department which has no control over usage; more significantly, office reorganisations and the resultant moves, increased security requirements, changes in employment numbers, and temporary office rentals all end up on the Facilities cost centre. The Catch 22 of prescriptive budgeting comes into play: "it does not exist, so you can't budget for it until it does, at which point it becomes an overspend to be recouped from the existing budget, so that it will not distort the next budget round".

Doing it their Way

What Accounts Departments want are simple mechanistic and straightforward processes controlled by them, allowing as little local input as possible. Thus at budget time spreadsheets are distributed to all cost centres, setting out all the cost heads, indicating previous year's budgets and actuals with a nice empty column for you to insert next year's figures. It all seems very helpful, but the accompanying papers will lay down an overall limit (perhaps even split by cost head) effectively dictating what can be entered in that nice empty column. Surprise, surprise: when the papers from all departments are consolidated, the sums miraculously add up to the figure first thought of by Accounts. This makes good reading for the Board and ensures that if actual results are wide of the mark then Accounts are in the clear. Budgeting in this fashion ceases to be an analytical and predictive tool and is transmuted into an academic exercise increasingly removed from the reality of line business decisions.

All the old Devices

The more mechanically proscribed the budget process the more susceptible it is to becoming a battle of wits and subterfuge. The line manager sets out to create a hidden surplus. Accounts set out to tie down every detail of cost. The process becomes adversarial with argument back and forth as to the validity of assumptions by either side. Instead of concentrating on the business's performance and future direction, all effort is directed inward.

Conflict is Unnecessary

Rational examination reveals that the warring parties are striving for the same result. It is the mechanisms which create the conflict, by focusing attention on the means rather than the ends. Strategic direction by the Board detailing the overall spend for the coming year is essential, and conformance by all areas of the company is a prerequisite of good corporate governance. The role of Accounts should be to provide accurate and detailed information about previous performance, and sound projections on what is happening with general costs and inflation. The role of line managers is then to utilise these figures to examine their plans and propose budgets that meet the company strategy. This involves hard work, rigorous analysis of every aspect of the operation, really difficult decisions and a degree of openness unachievable under the adversarial system.

How does it Work?

Managers should use information collected by Accounts to review every aspect of the previous year's spend against three essential criteria.

The first test is the most important. We are all disinclined to embrace change. Yet the budget process presents us with the ideal opportunity to question everything. Security, catering, cleaning, maintenance, utilities: there is no activity that cannot be examined for need, price, or waste avoidance. This approach, taken together with the company strategic decisions on costs and revenues, will create an environment in which line managers ensure that the application of the strategy is wedded to the needs of the business rather than to the artificial requirements of an accounting procedure.
(C) John O'Keefe. John is a freelance facilities manager. He can be reached at 01531 890214